The argument was also made by the company in its plea stating that "recent proliferation of anonymous websites is not a mere coincidence but is actuated by malafide to take advantage of the vulnerability of innocent viewers in such unprecedented times of the pandemic and ride upon the stronghold enjoyed by Aaj Tak". The order from the Delhi High Court goes a long way in protecting a news brand against fake news and fake screen grabs which have led to rampant disinformation being circulated in public in the name of news, especially during the pandemic.
![india aaj tak india aaj tak](https://i2.wp.com/www.opindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/WhatsApp-Image-2021-02-26-at-7.09.48-PM.jpeg)
![india aaj tak india aaj tak](https://www.exchange4media.com/news-photo/112673-pic461.jpg)
The bench, prima-facie agreeing with the plaintiff, granted an ex-parte injunction in favour of Aaj Tak, directing Google and Facebook to block/suspend 25 such pages called 'Aaj Tak Live', 'Aaj Tak India News', 'E-Aaj Tak', etc. Living Media India Ltd, the parent company of the Aaj Tak brand, had argued before the Court that the anonymous websites, trying to pass off as Aaj Tak, were deceiving and misleading the general public that these anonymous sites were linked to the Aaj Tak brand, and the same was causing immense losses to the brand's goodwill and reputation. The bench has also impleaded all these websites as parties to the case along with Google, Facebook and other Domain Name Registrars, issuing notice to them and calling upon them to respond by October third week. In September 2020, the High Court had passed a similar order against four defendants, which has now been extended to another 25 different websites. The Delhi High Court single-judge bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait on Monday directed Google and Facebook to block 25 different websites, accounts and pages accused of infringing the "Aaj Tak" trademark and misleading the consumers into believing that these "anonymous" websites are somehow related to the Aaj Tak brand. However, some other photos shared by it confirm that this tweet was indeed fake and aired by outlets without verification.The order from the Delhi High Court goes a long way in protecting a news brand against fake news and fake screen grabs which have led to rampant disinformation being circulated in the public in the name of news. The handle which posted the tweet in question has now been deleted. However, the pilot had not suffered any major injuries. Analysis: It takes Aaj Tak to deliver unprecedented viewership During the first week of the lockdown, Hindi news channel Aaj Tak achieved an unprecedented milestone as it raced past top general. I hope you will correct the reportĪmerican outlets like ABC and had published reports carrying the photo in question in April 2018, describing it as a US F16 fighter jet that had crashed in Arizona.
#India aaj tak tv#
His real account is The picture used is not a Pakistani jet in #panjshir, its a US jet in Arizona from 2018. AajTak: Hindi news ( ) website, watch live tv coverages, Latest Khabar, Breaking news in Hindi of India, World, Sports, business, film and Entertainment. I wanted to clarify that the account of Ahmad Massoud used in your report is fake. He added that this image was actually from 2018 and showed an American jet, not a Pakistani jet. Replying to India Today’s aforementioned tweet, Pakistani journalist Hamza Azhar Salam said that the tweet which formed the basis for the report was posted by a fake handle.
![india aaj tak india aaj tak](https://i0.wp.com/www.opindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/IMG_7814.jpg)
Meanwhile, Panjshir fighters and Northern Alliance forces have declared a rebellion throughout Afghanistan under the leadership of Ahmad Massoud.” Hindi daily Hindustan made the same claim in a report. Aaj Tak also reported, “Panjshir rebel leader Ahmad Massoud has claimed that Pakistani jets were shot down by Panjshir fighters.” The channel claimed that Massoud tweeted, “Pakistani jet plane shot down by our lion cubs.